Dapat tugas mereview paper, hmmm...

 Assalamuallaikum Wr. Wb.

Semalam diminta kolega untuk me review paper seminar IEEE. bukan karena saya expert tapi karena sesuai bidang.. saya mah masih jauh dari expert...

ok, sy OK saja untuk me review sebagai pengalaman baru. 

ok, sy buka web edas dan comform untuk accept review.

Awalnya saya berpikir untuk mengecek hal-hal dasar seperti cek plagiarism dan grammar ternyata di dalam edas sudah tersedia poin-poin pertanyaan kesimpulan kepada reviewer. Bagus juga ni, membantu reviewer mereview.

ini daftar pertanyaan tersebut. 

1. *The Research Novelty: Rate the novelty and originality of the ideas or results presented in the paper.
   A pioneering piece of work. Striking novel ideas or results.
   Significant original work and novel results.
   Some interesting ideas and results on a subject well investigated.
   Minor variations on a well investigated subject.
   It has been said many times before.
2. *Research Methods: Research methods appropriateness and evidence adequacy (the relation between method and problem)
   Research method is easily identified and is appropriate to address the problem
   Research method is not easily identified, but only partially appropriate to address the problem
   Research method is not clearly identified, but inappropriateness is not evident
   Research method does not answer the problem
   Research method cannot be identified
3. *Future Impact: Future impact on related subject of the research/society.
   Future impact is clearly defined, and is relevant to varied research/society
   Future impact is defined but not very clear; the likely impact is relevant to some research/society
   Future impact is not explicitly defined; the likely impact is limited
   Future impact is not defined; the likely impact is questionable
   Future impact cannot be identified.
4. *The Clarity of Research Question: The clarity of research question/problem and relevance of the literature overview
   Problem is easily identified in the introductory section, and clearly related to literature review
   Problem can be identified, and related to literature review
   Problem is incompletely reported, and the relevance to literature review is not clear
   Problem is incomprehensible, and literature review is vague
   Problem is not reported, and literature is poorly reviewed
5. *Scientific argument and discussion: The strength of argument and discussion in connecting research finding with original research question. - The summary and conclusions (indicating to what degree the problem has been solved)
   Excellent discussion with good amount of evidence to support conclusion
   Good discussion with adequate evidence to support conclusion
   Standard arguments that only partially support the conclusion
   Conclusions are not supported by decent discussion
   Conclusions and/or discussions are absent

 Detailed comments: Please justify your recommendation and suggest improvements in technical content or presentation.

2. Comments to the TPC: Confidential comments to the TPC (will not be sent to Authors).
3. Best Paper Award: Would you recommend this paper for Best Paper Award? (Yes/No). Why?
4. Email me a copy of the review
5.